That's great news ... thanks for being a guinea pig on this. I suspect you'll see a bit more PermGen usage, the same amount of thrash in the eden space (mostly DOM nodes and temporary strings), but a lot less in the long-lived heap.
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:14 AM, Blower, Andy <andy.blo...@proquest.co.uk> wrote: > First indications show that the move away from page pooling has dramatically > decreased the memory required by our Tapestry app. Thank you Howard. I've not > been able to spend long profiling the differences unfortunately, so I have no > concrete numbers. > > I do have one question however, do the tapestry.page-pool.* configuration > values have any effect any more? > > Cheers, > > Andy > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
