if that's the case, probably Groovy is for scripting and test code for now.
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo wrote: > > On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 00:54:46 -0200, Angelo C. <angelochen...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > All the performance comparisons I've seen show Java performance to be 10x > of the Groovy one. Being a dynamic-typed language has its cost. > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > Independent Java, Apache Tapestry 5 and Hibernate consultant, developer, > and instructor > Owner, Ars Machina Tecnologia da Informação Ltda. > http://www.arsmachina.com.br > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > -- View this message in context: http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/T5-scripting-tp3291002p3295149.html Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
