On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Lenny Primak <lpri...@hope.nyc.ny.us>wrote:
> Hmmm. I thought this was The same as Igor's module. > I don't like the name "Igor's module". I'd rather call it "Tapestry's native JPA integration". > > Whats the best one to use on a brand new project using the latest and > greatest? > If you are using Tapestry 5.3, then I'd go with the built-in integration. It covers a bit more than Tynamo's module: multiple persistence units and xml-less jpa configuration. -- Best regards, Igor Drobiazko http://tapestry5.de
