Would it be possible to put all three in one stack, or does 1.css and 3.css have conflicting rules?
I think the intended use of the stack functionality was to make an all (or mostly) inclusive one for your entire app/library and re-use it in many places; the rationale being that the savings in number of requests (and the corresponding overhead) outweighs the slight increase in size. On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 12:05 AM, Bo Gao <eli...@gmail.com> wrote: > I want to use stacks to combine many small Css and Javascript to reduce HTTP > requests. > I see tapestry use this to combine many javascript files into a core.js. > > I have 2 pages for example: > > page1 depends on 1.css, 2.css > page2 depends on 2.css, 3.css > > If I want to minimize HTTP request on these pages, what's the best way to > create stacks? > In my thought, I create page1stack.java to combine 1.css and 2.css, and > page2stack.java to combine 2.css and 3.css. > But I think it's not easy to use. I must create many stacks. Is there another > better way to use stack? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Bo Gao > eli...@gmail.com > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
