The J2EE specification states that you should never read or write to the local file system. Using the local file system raises many issues including security, portability, transactions, clustering and thread safety. I don't really agree with including a FileAssetFactory in the Tapestry source as this would encourage people to do what I consider to be the wrong thing. Is there any chance you could use a BLOB in a database or some other more scalable solution?
- File System Asset Factory help needed and petition wanted bhorvat
- Re: File System Asset Factory help needed and petition ... bhorvat
- Re: File System Asset Factory help needed and petit... Lance Java
- Re: File System Asset Factory help needed and p... arterzatij
- Re: File System Asset Factory help needed a... trsvax
- Re: File System Asset Factory help nee... bhorvat
- Re: File System Asset Factory help... trsvax
- Re: File System Asset Factory ... bhorvat
- Re: File System Asset Factory ... trsvax
- Re: File System Asset Factory ... Joakim Olsson
- Re: File System Asset Factory ... bhorvat
- Re: File System Asset Factory ... bhorvat
- Re: File System Asset Factory ... trsvax