Hi You are not going to get a fair comparison in a tapestry mailing list :). Try it on stack-overflow.
IMHO tapestry-jquery has a lot of components and you can easily create a new one . Also tapestry is a lot more than set of components. The power of class-reloading, class transformations, mixins, testability, inbuilt IOC etc can't be ignored. regards Taha On Aug 12, 2012, at 12:14 AM, lukaszkaleta wrote: > The question is what you need more: > 1. RichClient like application on the web - then you can go with vaadin, > since it has many build in components > 2. If you look for good perfomnace in faver of rich components then tapestry > is better choice IMHO > > I used vaadin for administrative application, the performance was not so > important. > Together with Google Guice as IoC it was nice combination. > > Tapestry has build in own IoC, but integrating Spring is very easy too. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://tapestry.1045711.n5.nabble.com/Tapestry5-vs-Vaadin-tp5715273p5715274.html > Sent from the Tapestry - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
