I think Tony wants us to go Gung Ho on the code base. Oh, so tempting, but I think we'll stay the course instead. I'm sure I could build a better IoC and framework than Tapestry 5 now, it's T5+5 years, but that wouldn't prove anything.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Thiago H de Paula Figueiredo < thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:45:31 -0200, Tony Nelson <tnel...@starpoint.com> > wrote: > > Aren't all the javascript changes in 5.4 going to break compatibility >> anyways? >> > > What server-side backward compatibility has to do with client-side one? > Specially in this case, in which someone expected something to be a service > because it was in a package named services? The less we break backward > compatibility, the better. > > > -- > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > users-unsubscribe@tapestry.**apache.org<users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry The source for Tapestry training, mentoring and support. Contact me to learn how I can get you up and productive in Tapestry fast! (971) 678-5210 http://howardlewisship.com
