Also, in this section<http://tapestry.apache.org/injection-in-detail.html#InjectioninDetail-Checkforserviceresources>it doesn't list String and service ID as a resource.
As a side note, if you look at the list item for ServiceResources it looks like the last part should actually be a new list item. Anyone agree? On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:06 AM, Eli Doran <e...@elidoran.com> wrote: > Also, it seems the fourth example in this > section<http://tapestry.apache.org/defining-tapestry-ioc-services.html#DefiningTapestryIOCServices-InjectingResources> > doesn't > work with Tapestry-IoC-5.3.6 (service builder method in the module > accepting 'String serviceId' parameter). > > Has this behavior changed in recent updates and the documentation is > behind? > > > > On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 11:15 PM, Eli Doran <e...@elidoran.com> wrote: > >> Using a String param in the service implementation constructor causes a >> RuntimeException stating "No service implements the interface >> java.lang.String". It is mentioned in multiple places in the documentation >> that a String type without the Inject or InjectService annotations will >> receive the ServiceId as a "Resource", but, I'm causing this exception >> instead. >> >> For an example below is a ServiceBinder call and the service >> implementation constructor prototype. >> >> serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, >>> ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId("TestId"); >>> >> serviceBinder.bind(ServiceIdAware.class, >>> ServiceIdAwareImpl.class).withId("TestId2"); >>> >> >>> >> public ServiceIdAwareImpl(String serviceId) >> >> >> Shouldn't that constructor receive the ServiceId specified in the withId >> method? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Steve Eynon < >> steve.ey...@alienfactory.co.uk> wrote: >> >>> No, but if your contribution is a service then you can inject the >>> ServiceId using the @Symbol annotation: >>> >>> >>> http://tapestry.apache.org/symbols.html#Symbols-InjectingValuesfromSymbols >>> >>> Steve. >>> >>> >>> On 15 March 2013 11:26, Eli Doran <e...@elidoran.com> wrote: >>> > When using OrderedConfiguration the add method's first argument is an >>> ID. >>> > Is it possible to inject that ID into the corresponding instance's >>> > constructor? >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org >>> >>> >> >
