As Dragan said, you have to add all modules manually.
In the thread I've posted a link to above you can find some references,
like here:

https://gist.github.com/dmitrygusev/6672859#file-baseintegrationtest-java-L11-L18

Notice, the class also extends AbstractShiroTest, because some additional
setup required for shiro and unit testing.


On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 11:59 PM, George Christman
<gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote:

> Am I going about this all the wrong way? Am I using the services correctly?
> I never see in any example test code where you guys are having to add all
> the modules. Any suggestions?
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:47 PM, George Christman
> <gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote:
>
> > and that is the easiest way to do it ugh lol
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Dragan Sahpaski <
> > dragan.sahpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> You have to manually add ALL the tapestry IOC modules you're using (in
> >> this
> >> case the tapestry-security module
> >> org.tynamo.security.services.SecurityModule), because you're starting
> only
> >> the Registry and not the entire webapp.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Dragan Sahpaski
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:22 PM, George Christman
> >> <gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote:
> >>
> >> > Dmitry, I'm very confused. I use constructor injection in my services
> >> which
> >> > I always thought was the correct way to do it based on the tap docs.
> >> >
> >> > I have the following test class where I'm trying to use a service.
> >> >
> >> > public class TimeSheetServiceTest {
> >> >
> >> >     protected static TimeSheetService timeSheetService;
> >> >
> >> >     @BeforeClass
> >> >     public static void setup() {
> >> >         Registry registry;
> >> >         RegistryBuilder builder = new RegistryBuilder();
> >> >         builder.add(AppModule.class);
> >> >         registry = builder.build();
> >> >         registry.performRegistryStartup();
> >> >         timeSheetService =
> registry.getService(TimeSheetService.class);
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> >     @Test
> >> >     public void testService() {
> >> >         int result =
> >> >
> >>
> timeSheetService.getHolidayListForPayPeriod(Calendar.getInstance()).size();
> >> >         System.out.println("result " + result);
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > TimeSheetService injects another service called UserInfoService
> userInfo
> >> > like so,
> >> >
> >> > public class TimeSheetServiceImpl implements TimeSheetService {
> >> >
> >> >     public TimeSheetServiceImpl(UserInfoService userInfo) {
> >> >         this.userInfo = userInfo;
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> > }
> >> >
> >> > When I try running my test class, I get the following exception.
> >> >
> >> > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> >> >
> >> > <!-- Generated by org.testng.reporters.JUnitReportReporter -->
> >> > -<testsuite errors="0" time="0.000" timestamp="21 Jan 2014 19:18:58
> GMT"
> >> > failures="1" tests="1"
> >> > name="org.domain.etss.services.form.TimeSheetServiceTest"
> >> > hostname="hri185169">
> >> > <!-- org.domain.etss.services.form.TimeSheetServiceTest -->
> >> > -<testcase time="0.000" name="testService"
> >> >
> classname="org.domain.etss.services.form.TimeSheetServiceTest">-<failure
> >> > message="Contribution
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.domain.etss.services.AppModule.contributeSecurityConfiguration(Configuration,
> >> > SecurityFilterChainFactory) (at AppModule.java:312) is for service
> >> > 'SecurityConfiguration', which does not exist."
> >> > type="java.lang.IllegalArgumentException">
> >> > <![CDATA[java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Contribution
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.domain.etss.services.AppModule.contributeSecurityConfiguration(Configuration,
> >> > SecurityFilterChainFactory) (at AppModule.java:312) is for service
> >> > 'SecurityConfiguration', which does not exist. at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.RegistryImpl.validateContributeDefs(RegistryImpl.java:236)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.internal.RegistryImpl.<init>(RegistryImpl.java:200)
> >> > at
> >> org.apache.tapestry5.ioc.RegistryBuilder.build(RegistryBuilder.java:170)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.domain.etss.services.form.TimeSheetServiceTest.setup(TimeSheetServiceTest.java:28)
> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:80)
> >> > at
> >> org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurationMethod(Invoker.java:551)
> >> > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurations(Invoker.java:213)
> at
> >> > org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeConfigurations(Invoker.java:138) at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeBeforeClassMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:175)
> >> > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:107)
> >> at
> >> > org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:768) at
> >> > org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:617) at
> >> > org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:334) at
> >> > org.testng.SuiteRunner.runSequentially(SuiteRunner.java:329) at
> >> > org.testng.SuiteRunner.privateRun(SuiteRunner.java:291) at
> >> > org.testng.SuiteRunner.run(SuiteRunner.java:240) at
> >> > org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.runSuite(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:53) at
> >> > org.testng.SuiteRunnerWorker.run(SuiteRunnerWorker.java:87) at
> >> > org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesSequentially(TestNG.java:1188) at
> >> > org.testng.TestNG.runSuitesLocally(TestNG.java:1113) at
> >> > org.testng.TestNG.run(TestNG.java:1025) at
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGExecutor.run(TestNGExecutor.java:72)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGXmlTestSuite.execute(TestNGXmlTestSuite.java:88)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.testng.TestNGProvider.invoke(TestNGProvider.java:101)
> >> > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43)
> >> > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:601) at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ProviderFactory$ClassLoaderProxy.invoke(ProviderFactory.java:103)
> >> > at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy0.invoke(Unknown Source) at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.invokeProvider(SurefireStarter.java:150)
> >> > at
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.SurefireStarter.runSuitesInProcess(SurefireStarter.java:91)
> >> > at
> >> org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.ForkedBooter.main(ForkedBooter.java:69)
> >> > ]]>
> >> > </failure></testcase>
> >> > <!-- testService -->
> >> > </testsuite>
> >> >
> >> > From this line
> >> >
> >> > public static void
> >> > contributeSecurityConfiguration(Configuration<SecurityFilterChain>
> >> > configuration,
> >> >
> >> > SecurityFilterChainFactory factory) {
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> configuration.add(factory.createChain("/employee/**").add(factory.roles(),
> >> > "employee").build());
> >> >
> configuration.add(factory.createChain("/").add(factory.roles(),
> >> > "user").build());
> >> >     }
> >> >
> >> > What am I missing?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Dmitry Gusev <dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Right, this is for integration testing. I use mocking too, but
> rarely
> >> --
> >> > my
> >> > > tests are 80% integration ones and involve DB (the same as in
> >> > production).
> >> > > For mocks I have to use constructor injection also, and this is the
> >> only
> >> > > reason why I use constructor injections.
> >> > > The code looks ugly in this cases, though, when you have more than 5
> >> > > dependencies per service. And it's also a tedious task when you want
> >> to
> >> > add
> >> > > another dependency to the service, because you have to update all
> test
> >> > > clients also. That's why I prefer @Inject.
> >> > >
> >> > > It would be nice to have some api to override, decorate, and advise
> >> some
> >> > > services on existing (built) registry instance right in the test
> >> method.
> >> > > Maybe (temporarily) replace some service with a mock. So that I
> won't
> >> > have
> >> > > to build new module just to override one service for one test case,
> >> > because
> >> > > it requires additional setup. Just a thoughts.
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Dragan Sahpaski
> >> > > <dragan.sahpa...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > > I agree with Dimitry but thats more for integration like testing.
> >> > > > For basic unit testing of services methods (usually we unit test a
> >> > single
> >> > > > method per test) we mock the dependencies (the injected services)
> >> and
> >> > > pass
> >> > > > the mocks through the constructor of the service implementation
> >> class
> >> > > under
> >> > > > test. That's why we prefer constructor based injection.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > If we need to mock methods in the service that's being bested than
> >> we
> >> > > > usually use Spy in Spock or the equivalent feature in other mock
> >> > > > frameworks.
> >> > > >
> >> > > > Cheers,
> >> > > > Dragan Sahpaski
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 6:34 PM, Dmitry Gusev <
> >> dmitry.gu...@gmail.com
> >> > > > >wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > > > I usually create base class where I construct registry instance,
> >> > then I
> >> > > > use
> >> > > > > registry.getService(Intf.class) when I need an instance of a
> >> service.
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > Like here:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> https://github.com/anjlab/anjlab-tapestry-commons/blob/master/anjlab-tapestry-quartz/src/test/java/com/anjlab/tapestry5/services/quartz/SchedulerTest.java
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 9:07 PM, George Christman
> >> > > > > <gchrist...@cardaddy.com>wrote:
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > > Hello, we are trying to unit test our services, but our
> services
> >> > > > contain
> >> > > > > > other injected services. I'm wondering how you test injected
> >> > > services.
> >> > > > Is
> >> > > > > > there a configuration I'm missing?
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > > > --
> >> > > > > > George Christman
> >> > > > > > www.CarDaddy.com
> >> > > > > > P.O. Box 735
> >> > > > > > Johnstown, New York
> >> > > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > --
> >> > > > > Dmitry Gusev
> >> > > > >
> >> > > > > AnjLab Team
> >> > > > > http://anjlab.com
> >> > > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > --
> >> > > Dmitry Gusev
> >> > >
> >> > > AnjLab Team
> >> > > http://anjlab.com
> >> > >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > George Christman
> >> > www.CarDaddy.com
> >> > P.O. Box 735
> >> > Johnstown, New York
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > George Christman
> > www.CarDaddy.com
> > P.O. Box 735
> > Johnstown, New York
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> George Christman
> www.CarDaddy.com
> P.O. Box 735
> Johnstown, New York
>



-- 
Dmitry Gusev

AnjLab Team
http://anjlab.com

Reply via email to