Glad to report that this resolved my issue. Thank you :)
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:59 PM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> wrote: > http://tapestry.apache.org/class-reloading.html > On 2 Jun 2014 22:49, "Boris Horvat" <horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hm...I did not know about this. Will try it out over the weekend. Thank > you > > very much. > > > > BTW is there some place in documentation where I can read about this > trick? > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 11:05 PM, Lance Java <lance.j...@googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Components and services are loaded by different classloaders. Services > > > should never reference component classes. > > > > > > Your service has a method: > > > refreshAjaxZones(Zone) > > > > > > This is the problem since Zone is a component. Try referencing the > > > interface ClientElement instead. > > > On 1 Jun 2014 12:41, "Boris Horvat" <horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > No it is the other way around. I want them to be part of the tapestry > > > > service, but for some reason it fails with the class loading > > exception. I > > > > think that by moving it to the *base *package it should work > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Lance Java < > lance.j...@googlemail.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > If you want to keep your utility out of the tapestry controlled > > > packages, > > > > > you can reference interfaces instead of concrete components. Make > > sure > > > > your > > > > > own interfaces are not in a tapestry controlled package. > > > > > On 1 Jun 2014 09:34, "Boris Horvat" <horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > That does sound promising. Will try it out. Thanks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 12:38 AM, Chris Mylonas < > ch...@opencsta.org > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > What if you move your classes from tapestry.utility to > > > > > > > tapestry.base.utility which is controlled by tapestry....maybe > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://tapestry.apache.org/class-reloading.html > > > > > > > On 01/06/2014 4:58 am, "Boris Horvat" < > horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > In what package should I put this component? Currently it > > resides > > > > in > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > package com.bomahabo.flow.tapestry.utility > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and it uses > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > private AjaxResponseRenderer ajaxResponseRenderer; > > > > > > > > private Request request; > > > > > > > > private JavaScriptSupport javascript; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Should I move it outside of the tapestry in order to help > with > > > this > > > > > > > issue? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 5:50 PM, Thiago H de Paula > Figueiredo < > > > > > > > > thiag...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 27 May 2014 10:29:09 -0300, Boris Horvat < > > > > > > > > horvat.z.bo...@gmail.com> > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > But it is only triggered in class re loading > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It could be a reloadable service being used both injected > > from > > > > > > > > > Tapestry-IoC and directly, not through T-IoC. If something > is > > > > live > > > > > > > class > > > > > > > > > reloadable, you should always access it though Tapestry > > > (classes > > > > in > > > > > > > > > controlled packages) or Tapestry-IoC (injected services). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo > > > > > > > > > Tapestry, Java and Hibernate consultant and developer > > > > > > > > > http://machina.com.br > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > users-h...@tapestry.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > Sincerely > > > > > > > > *Boris Horvat* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Sincerely > > > > > > *Boris Horvat* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sincerely > > > > *Boris Horvat* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely > > *Boris Horvat* > > > -- Sincerely *Boris Horvat*
