I was thinking about that but never tried as it doesn't seem intuitive at all :) But thanks for the hint, I will refactor.
Adam On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Cezary Biernacki <[email protected]> wrote: > You can do: > > jsSupport.require("foo").invoke("myFunc").with("bar"); > > Best regards, > Cezary > > > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Adam X <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there a reason this is not a fluid setter? Right now I have to do: >> >> Initialization foo = jsSupport.require("foo"); >> foo.with("bar"); >> foo.invoke("myFunc"); >> >> I'd rather just do: >> >> jsSupport.require("foo").with("bar").invoke("myFunc") >> >> >> but with(Object...) returns void :( >> >> Adam >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
