Tapestry is still alive and kicking, but like most (all?) server-side web frameworks, it is seeing a decline in activity as developers switch to single-page applications using JavaScript UI frameworks such as Angular, React and Vue.js. In my opinion Tapestry is still an excellent choice for apps where you expect to generate at least some of the pages on the server, and it also provides some benefits for single-page apps as well.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Peter Hvass <peter.hv...@jamesinnes.com> wrote: > I don't see a good reason why Tapestry should be proclaimed dead so long as > it's kept active! > > Many of the more 'modern' alternatives just are not mature enough or ready > for serious, corporate projects yet. > > Kind regards, > Peter > > On 5 January 2017 at 17:47, <christophe.foi...@valdoise.fr> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I discover recently Tapestry and it's for me a great Framework but my boss >> tells me that his end is near ... >> >> and the github https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf?p=tapestry-5. >> git;a=summary has less and less activities >> >> Could you tell me if this Framework will continue to be maintained ? When >> the next version 5.5 will be delivered ? >> >> If not, what framework could remplace it with same fonctionnalities ? and >> responsive interface >> >> Vaadin ? Spring boot ? Grails ? ZK ? Others ? >> >> Thanks in advance >> >> Avant d'imprimer, pensez à l'environnement. >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tapestry.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tapestry.apache.org
