> From: Robert Koberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: static server implementation? > > If you have a need for many virtual hosts, but do not need > or want any ability for dynamic activity it would make sense > to have a limited version of a tomcat host/context. I mean, > I have a need to create VHosts from java, but those VHosts > should not be able to affect anything (Read Only).
I'm still not understanding why a standard Tomcat isn't sufficient. If you don't configure any dynamic content capabilities, none will magically appear to thwart your goals. Are you concerned about performance? Have you tested a static-only Tomcat to see if it's adequate for your needs? - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
