Bob Bronson wrote:
Hi All,
Just a word of warning...apparently the sloppy Tomcat programmers did
not thoroughly test TC 5.5.12.
Tomcat isn't perfect but it looks like the validation errors you are
seeing are caused by a spec problem. See
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31125 for more info.
The <Host> element has an attribute, "xmlValidation". In the default
server.xml that's distributed with TC this value is set to false. If you
set it to "true" you will see a boatload of very nice, completely
unfriendly stack traces. Thank you, lazy Tomcat developers. I set this
attribute to "true" on my own web app, hoping to validate my simple
web.xml, and I received the same stack trace.
>
It's bad enough that this feature was not tested before TC 5.5.12 was
released, but why couldn't the TC programmers give nice, easy to read
error messages instead of an ugly stack trace? Lazy programmers with no
regard for user friendly messages, that's why.
Patches to improve error messages or any other part of Tomcat are
always welcome.
Oh BTW, if you are wondering what the "xmlValidation" attribute is for
don't bother looking at the TC documentation
(http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/host.html). It seems the
Tomcat programmers did bother to update the documentation. It still the
same crappy, incomplete documentation we've been living with for so many
years.
Yep, some of the attributes are missing from the docs and yes this
makes things more difficult than they need to be. As people point out
the errors they will get fixed. They will get fixed faster if someone
provides a patch.
Personally, I am getting really sick of the sloppiness of the Tomcat
programmers. It's not just this 'xmlValidation' issue but several others
over the past years. Additionally, I'm fed up with their snotty,
arrogant attitudes.
When someone criticizes the poor state of an open sores project (as I am
doing now), the typical response from the open sores programmer is to
shift responsibility to the user -- the user is often told to dig
through the change logs or browse the forum archives or even to fix the
bug/documentation themselves instead of "useless complaining". What an
unprofessional, lazy attitude from programmers! The open sores
programmers try to cast *their* laziness as the user's laziness for "not
digging deeply enough" to resolve their own problem, or even fixing the
problem themselves by going into the source code.
The supplier-customer relationship is very different in open source
projects. In fact, it just doesn't exist. There is no them and us. We
are all users, we are all developers, we all provide support to the
other members of our community. Everyone is welcome to contribute.
Contributions can take many forms: Some people write code; some answer
user questions on this list. However we contribute, we are all part of
the one community and we all have a part to play to make Tomcat even
better than it is today.
Criticism is fine and is welcomed when it is constructive. Criticism
with a patch to fix the problem is even better ;)
Yes, yes, I know Tomcat is "not for me". You're right. Good bye Tomcat,
hello Jetty. I dobt Jetty could be worse.
I sincerely hope that you are able to find the product that is right
for you. Good luck with both your current and future projects.
Mark
--
Bob Bronson
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]