The following connector exists in the Tomcat 5.5.15 OOTB server.xml. <!-- Define an AJP 1.3 Connector on port 8009 --> <Connector port="8009" enableLookups="false" redirectPort="8443" protocol="AJP/1.3" /> I think that is all you need on the Tomcat side. , Josh.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:14 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: > why use mod_jk?) > > > Josh, > > Thanks a lot for your answer. I am using Apache 2.2.x. Now onto my > next question. Bill Barker suggested the httpd.conf / mod_proxy_ajp > directive side of the equation. Doesn't there have to be a connector > in tomcat's server.xml which will allow listening for the ajp > protocol? Is there documentation on this somewhere? > > Brad > > On Feb 24, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Fenlason, Josh wrote: > > > That depends if you want to use Apache 2.0.x, Apache 2.2.x, or some > > other web server (i.e. IIS). If you're planning on using Apache > > 2.2.x, > > mod_proxy_ajp is the way to go. For anything else, mod_jk is the > > way to > > go. > > , > > Josh. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Brad O'Hearne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> Sent: Friday, February 24, 2006 9:02 AM > >> To: Tomcat Users List > >> Subject: Which direction: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? (was: why use > >> mod_jk?) > >> > >> > >> I suppose this question deserved its own thread. Before I > spend any > >> more time trying to get this configured, I would like to > know what is > >> the best way to proceed: mod_jk or mod_proxy_ajp? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Brad > >> > >> On Feb 24, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Brad O'Hearne wrote: > >> > >>> Jess, > >>> > >>> Thanks for the reply. Responses below: > >>> > >>> On Feb 24, 2006, at 6:51 AM, Jess Holle wrote: > >>> > >>>> If you're using Apache 1.3.x or 2.0.x, mod_jk is pretty simple > >>>> overall. > >>>> > >>>> No, you don't want to even try in-process stuff and, yes, if you > >>>> have a firewall in between Apache and Tomcat that drops idle > >>>> connections you should read carefully (this is covered by > >> the docs). > >>>> > >>>> The only big complaint I have is that the mod_jk docs > don't make it > >>>> terribly clear (or didn't last I checked) exactly how to set > >>>> jvmRoute in Tomcat and how extraordinarily critical this is when > >>>> doing load balancing. The Tomcat docs don't make this terribly > >>>> clear either -- apart from a comment in server.xml. Most > >> everyone > >>>> I know who tries mod_jk load balancing gets hung up on this one > >>>> point unless/until I give them a detailed explanation. > >> Apart from > >>>> the lack of clear/obvious information on this in the mod_jk docs > >>>> (which should include it considering most folk won't > think to check > >>>> both mod_jk and Tomcat docs), this is actually very > simple as well, > >>>> though. > >>>> > >>> > >>> None of the configuration steps in and of itself are difficult. > >>> Building mod_jk is not difficult. Editing configuration > files is not > >>> difficult. Its after you've put it all together, exactly > as noted on > >>> a hodge-podge of Googled URLs, and it doesn't work, and > one cryptic > >>> line in a log file, and the right connections > >> not being > >>> made between apache and tomcat, which send you into hours > of trial > >>> and error. With regards to your comments above, I didn't > tangle with > >>> load balancing at all, and apache and tomcat reside on > the same box, > >>> no firewall between them. Yes, you'd think this would be simple. > >>> > >>>> I am looking forward to mod_proxy_ajp as it is supposed > be a tiny > >>>> bit faster. > >>> > >>> You say you are "looking forward to mod_proxy_ajp" -- > does this mean > >>> its not available yet, or you just aren't using it yet? > While I am > >>> glad to learn now of mod_proxy_ajp, I guess this kind of > adds to my > >>> frustration a bit -- what is the way to go now and why: > >>> mod_proxy_ajp or mod_jk? > >>> > >>> Thanks for your help. > >>> > >>> Brad > >>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Jess Holle > >>>> > >>>> Brad O'Hearne wrote: > >>>>> mod_proxy_ajp? Yet another twist. Its just hard for me to > >> believe > >>>>> that "how do I integrate tomcat and apache httpd?" is such a > >>>>> mystery / unknown. This seems like it would be question > >> #1 on any > >>>>> Tomcat FAQ. > >>>>> > >>>>> So where can I found out more about mod_proxy_ajp. Is there a > >>>>> Tomcat resource which explains the configuration of it? > >>>>> > >>>>> Brad > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Bill Barker wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> "Brad O'Hearne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news: > >>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> After wasting time trying to configure mod_jk, I thought I'd > >>>>>>> just wipe my mind free and just play dumb for a moment. If > >>>>>>> Apache can proxy requests using mod_proxy, what is > the benefit > >>>>>>> of using mod_jk as an integration technique between httpd and > >>>>>>> tomcat, if integration is *not* in-process, which I > understand > >>>>>>> is not recommended for Tomcat 5.5? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Actually, in-process with mod_jk is only supported (and, I use > >>>>>> the term lightly :) for TC 3.3.x. For any higher versions it > >>>>>> doesn't work at all. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> You've managed to grasp the deep, dark plan of the Tomcat > >>>>>> developers: It is expected that people will migrate to > >>>>>> mod_proxy_ajp with Httpd 2.2+, and mod_jk is expected to > >> move to > >>>>>> supporting IIS/SunOne only (and, the later only if > somebody steps > >>>>>> up with interest :). > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Brad > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >> > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> - > >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]