On Mar 15, 2013, at 10:21 AM, Mladen Turk wrote: > Otherwise it'll just slow you down.
That's what I was looking for. I didn't see any indication anywhere that OCSP came with a performance hit, so my thought was, "why wouldn't you just always use the OCSP version?" Thanks for clarifying this. > Since the current implementation does not have enable/disable configuration > the only way was to make it compile time enabled/disabled. > > In future I see those two will become one version with runtime selection. That would certainly be an improvement, in my mind. :-) Thanks, Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
