On 22.11.2013, at 02:20, Christopher Schultz <ch...@christopherschultz.net> wrote: >> I also think that this is a justifiable spec violation, and all I’m >> asking is that this fact is shown more prominently, esp. as JDBC >> pool is advertised as a drop-in replacement for DBCP. > > Fair enough. Care you file a documentation bug and possibly provide a > patch?
Will do, not sure I’ll get to it before the weekend though. Rainer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
