On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:45 PM, Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de> wrote:
> On 08.01.2014 18:25, Martin Knoblauch wrote: > > Hi, > > > > happy New year. Should be still early enough for this :-) > > > > I have one short question: what is the status of mod_jk-1.2.38? It has > been > > over a year since 1.2.37 and I am just curious. I am specially interested > > in an "official" fix for *Bug > > 53762*<https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53762>. > > The patch mentioned there works, but cannot be used due to an "only > > official releases" policy at the customer site. > > I did some more changes lately due to a user request which need some > more testing. I expect that we'll do the 1.2.38 release during the next > 4-8 weeks. I have to ask Mladen about the status of his IPv6 changes > though. > > Cool. Thanks for the info. > > On a related note: is mod_jk still the preferred way for HA and > > load-balancing tomcats? Are there better ways? Our environment is > currently > > httpd/mod_jk/tomcat on Linux. > > Better or worse depend on your requirements. I think mod_jk is still > working very well and has some unique advantages. > > OK, good to know. I have no actual issues using mod_jk. It is working well and does what we need. Just the release frequency is a bit low, which is not really a technical thing. But then maybe mod_jk is perfect :-) anyway, do you (or someone on the list) happen to know a good comparison/discussion of the available options? Cheers Martin -- ------------------------------------------------------ Martin Knoblauch email: k n o b i AT knobisoft DOT de www: http://www.knobisoft.de
