Hi, we ended up not making the change. On Friday, June 13, 2014, Krishna Surabhi [via Tomcat] < ml-node+s10n5018705...@n6.nabble.com> wrote:
> Did you see any improvement or degradation after you made this change ?. > > ------------------------------ > If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion > below: > > http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/max-packet-size-for-data-in-mod-jk-tp5009929p5018705.html > To unsubscribe from max_packet_size for data in mod_jk, click here > <http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=5009929&code=ZnJlbmNoY0BnbWFpbC5jb218NTAwOTkyOXwxODMzOTQwNDE4> > . > NAML > <http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=macro_viewer&id=instant_html%21nabble%3Aemail.naml&base=nabble.naml.namespaces.BasicNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NabbleNamespace-nabble.view.web.template.NodeNamespace&breadcrumbs=notify_subscribers%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-instant_emails%21nabble%3Aemail.naml-send_instant_email%21nabble%3Aemail.naml> > -- View this message in context: http://tomcat.10.x6.nabble.com/max-packet-size-for-data-in-mod-jk-tp5009929p5018706.html Sent from the Tomcat - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
