Hi Prashant,

On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Prashant Deva <prashant.d...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> ok running on tomcat 8.0.8 with spring 4.0.5 and reactor 1.1.2, my log
> within minutes gets filled with these exceptions.
>
> Seems like it could be a tomcat issue after all:
>

This error could be also read as: the client (the browser) closed the
connection unexpectedly. So it could be an error in the application too
The best you can do is to create a mini application that exposes the
problem and attach it to a ticket in Tomcat's Bugzilla or Spring's JIRA
with detailed explanation how to reproduce the problem.


> 11:35:37,922 ERROR http-nio-80-exec-37
> handler.LoggingWebSocketHandlerDecorator:61 - Transport error for SockJS
> session id=hv4ncrvg
> java.io.IOException: Connection reset by peer
>         at sun.nio.ch.FileDispatcherImpl.read0(Native Method)
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketDispatcher.read(SocketDispatcher.java:39)
>         at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.readIntoNativeBuffer(IOUtil.java:223)
>         at sun.nio.ch.IOUtil.read(IOUtil.java:197)
>         at sun.nio.ch.SocketChannelImpl.read(SocketChannelImpl.java:379)
>         at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioChannel.read(NioChannel.java:135)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.upgrade.NioServletInputStream.fillReadBuffer(NioServletInputStream.java:136)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.upgrade.NioServletInputStream.doRead(NioServletInputStream.java:80)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.upgrade.AbstractServletInputStream.read(AbstractServletInputStream.java:120)
>         at
>
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsFrameServer.onDataAvailable(WsFrameServer.java:46)
>         at
>
> org.apache.tomcat.websocket.server.WsHttpUpgradeHandler$WsReadListener.onDataAvailable(WsHttpUpgradeHandler.java:194)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.upgrade.AbstractServletInputStream.onDataAvailable(AbstractServletInputStream.java:194)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.upgrade.AbstractProcessor.upgradeDispatch(AbstractProcessor.java:95)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.AbstractProtocol$AbstractConnectionHandler.process(AbstractProtocol.java:650)
>         at
>
> org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11NioProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.process(Http11NioProtocol.java:222)
>         at
>
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.doRun(NioEndpoint.java:1566)
>         at
>
> org.apache.tomcat.util.net.NioEndpoint$SocketProcessor.run(NioEndpoint.java:1523)
>         at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>         at
>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>         at
>
> org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.TaskThread$WrappingRunnable.run(TaskThread.java:61)
>         at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>
>
> Prashant
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Prashant Deva <prashant.d...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > just noticed this, you tried running on tomcat 8, while we are running
> > 7.0.53...
> >
> > Prashant
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:36 PM, Prashant Deva <prashant.d...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> our production instance (which we are running into issues with) has
> about
> >> 2500 concurrent users.
> >>
> >> Prashant
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Rossen Stoyanchev <
> >> rstoyanc...@gopivotal.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 4:04 PM, Prashant Deva <
> prashant.d...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Rossen,
> >>> >  Did you use an external queue?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Yes I did have the sample configured to use RabbitMQ for broadcasting
> >>> messages. That's running as a separate process though so it shouldn't
> >>> change the output of "lsof".
> >>>
> >>> How many clients were connected at the same time?
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>> In the sample, just one. I also ran a load test with 500 concurrent
> users
> >>> (1 million messages) and the file descriptor count remains stable
> (around
> >>> 500).
> >>>
> >>> I'd reverse the question, how many users do you have to run with to
> >>> demonstrate the issue?
> >>>
> >>> Rossen
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to