I've narrowed this down to JkOptions +FlushPackets and some combination of workers.properties configurations causing it. I'm trying to pinpoint which combination.
Opened the following bug: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56733 Andy On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 19:58 +0000, Wang, Andy wrote: On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 15:51 +0000, Wang, Andy wrote: > We have a customer that's seeing a very slow memory leak under certain > circumstances that we haven't yet been able to pinpoint. I can > reproduce it, but it requires a very particular method of downloading > files that I don't quite understand yet. (not entirely sure how this > would impact mod_jk either). Our customer is still on an older mod_jk > 1.2.37 but I'm able to see the behavior on 1.2.40. > > They had Microsoft analyze a memory dump and Microsoft came to the > analysis that mod_jk was leaking 8k at a time and this is the stack of > each allocation: > Function Destination > libapr_1!apr_palloc+212 msvcrt!malloc > libaprutil_1!apr_brigade_create+11 libapr_1!apr_palloc > libhttpd!ap_rflush+19 libaprutil_1!apr_brigade_create > mod_jk+3183a libhttpd!ap_rflush > mod_jk+9729 > mod_jk+f3bd > kernel32!TlsSetValueStub > ntdll!_except_handler4 > msvcrt!_except_handler4 > ntdll!_except_handler4 > ntdll!FinalExceptionHandler > msvcrt!_threadstartex > > I'm far far from a Windows developer :( so I'm slowly getting a system > configured to do the debugdiag analysis that Microsoft did with the pdb > files to get the actual symbols. This will take me some time so I > thought I'd mail here to see of anyone has seen anything similar or if > there's any thoughts on what would be slowly leaking the 8k through > mod_jk. > > If not, I'll try to get the real stack shortly once I get debugdiag > figured out. > > Thanks, > Andy > Managed to reproduce this on httpd 2.2.27 and mod_jk 1.2.40 Here's the stack I'm pulling from Microsoft's debugdiag: Function Destination libapr_1!allocator_alloc+d6 msvcr100!malloc libapr_1!apr_palloc+d9 libapr_1!allocator_alloc libaprutil_1!apr_brigade_create+11 libapr_1!apr_palloc libhttpd!ap_rflush+19 libaprutil_1!apr_brigade_create mod_jk!ws_flush+1a libhttpd!ap_rflush mod_jk!ajp_process_callback+586 mod_jk!ajp_get_reply+c4 mod_jk!ajp_process_callback mod_jk!ajp_service+60a mod_jk!ajp_get_reply mod_jk!service+82f mod_jk!jk_handler+6ea libhttpd!ap_run_handler+25 libhttpd!ap_invoke_handler+a2 libhttpd!ap_run_handler libhttpd!ap_process_request+3e libhttpd!ap_invoke_handler libhttpd!ap_process_http_connection+52 libhttpd!ap_process_request libhttpd!ap_run_process_connection+25 libhttpd!ap_process_connection+33 libhttpd!ap_run_process_connection libhttpd!worker_main+a7 libhttpd!ap_process_connection msvcr100!_callthreadstartex+1b msvcr100!_threadstartex+64 kernel32!BaseThreadInitThunk+e ntdll!__RtlUserThreadStart+70 ntdll!_RtlUserThreadStart+1b ntdll!__RtlUserThreadStart msvcr100!_threadstartex I have a relatively large file I'm downloading through a servlet (unfortunately I didn't write the servlet and am not completely familiar with what they're doing) and memory slowly slowly grows and isn't released. 300mb file grows by a few megs each download. I can't reproduce with the default tomcat file servlet so not sure what the deal here is. Going to poke some more but hoping for some ideas. Thanks, Andy B�KKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKCB�� [��X��ܚX�KK[XZ[� \�\��][��X��ܚX�P �X�] �\X�K�ܙ�B��܈Y][ۘ[��[X[� �K[XZ[� \�\��Z[ �X�] �\X�K�ܙ�B�
