Aye, Marc, I saw that. I'm not using proxy_balance, and the server.xml file you posted looks almost exactly like mine (the main difference being the port). Currently I'm defining the proxies for AJP in the httpd.conf file as:

ProxyPass / ajp://localhost:8009/
ProxyPass /test ajp://localhost:8009/test

And both are still producing the "requested resource not available" error. Could using the <Proxy> directive affect the results?

Cheers,
-- Steven

Marc Bächinger wrote:
Hi Steven

I posted one some days ago to this list. Maybe this is helpful:

--- forwarded post -------
i'm everthing but an expert in this, but i got loadbalancing with ajp working with those versions you mention (2.2.2 and 5.5.17). Maybe my config below is helpful for you.

The documentation on the net about configuration of the new built-in ajp support through the proxy module was rather thin. The best howto i found is in german (the config samples maybe helpful even if the rest is german):

http://www.linuxforen.de/forums/showthread.php?t=209010

marc

my config:

in server.xml:

      <Connector port="9002" URIEncoding="UTF-8"
                   maxThreads="25"
                   minSpareThreads="4"
                   maxSpareThreads="10"
                   enableLookups="false"
                   acceptCount="100"
                   protocol="AJP/1.3"
                   request.registerRequests="true" />
        <Engine name="Catalina"
                defaultHost="localhost"
                jvmRoute="node1" >

in httpd.conf :
-------------------------------------------
<IfModule mod_proxy_balancer.c>

    <Location /balancer-manager>
        SetHandler balancer-manager
    </Location>

    <Proxy balancer://cluster>
        BalancerMember ajp://localhost:9002 route=node1
        BalancerMember ajp://localhost:9102 route=node2
    </Proxy>

    <Location /axis2>
        ProxyPass balancer://cluster/axis2 stickysession=JSESSIONID
    </Location>
</IfModule>




Am Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2006 04.36 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Filip,

Do you happen to have any examples of your mod_proxy setup?  I've been
trying to get mod_proxy and mod_proxy_ajp working (apache 2.2.2, tomcat
5.5.17), and have been running into a wall.  No matter what I've tried,
tomcat always returns a "requested resource not available" error.

Cheers,
-- Steven

Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
mod_proxy
- easy to configure
- scales without limitation

mod_jk
- hard to compile,configure
- in our tests, would not scale well at all

Differences are:
mod_jk supports load balancing and also passing along SSL info to Tomcat.
mod_proxy is a regular http proxy, remember to set
"ProxyPassPreserveHost On", and then set the proxyPort directive on your
<Connector> in server.xml

Filip

Mann, Bradley wrote:
What are the exact differences between mod_proxy and mod_jk? What are
the benefits/drawbacks of each?

Thanks,

Brad Mann
Software Engineer - Information Access Services
HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
(321) 984-6292

-----Original Message-----
From: Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:
Wednesday, June 07, 2006 4:45 PM
To: Tomcat Users List
Subject: Re: HTTPD with Tomcat

you can also make your own life very easy, by switching to mod_proxy,
and voila, everything works :)

Filip

Mann, Bradley wrote:
Hello,

I am attempting to setup a scenario in which Tomcat is hosting a web
application behind HTTPD using the Jakarta Connector. I have installed
the following on Solaris 10:

Apache HTTPD 2.0.58
Apache Tomcat 4.1.31
Apache Jakarta Tomcat Connector 1.2.15

I am able to access HTTPD's document root, and I am able to access my
web application through Tomcat. I am having trouble, however,
understanding how to get the two to interact using the connector. I
believe I have it setup properly, with mod_jk located in the /modules
directory of HTTPD, and with an Include statement at the end of
httpd.conf that points to the /conf/auto/mod_jk.conf of Tomcat. Under
the Server section of server.xml in the /conf directory of Tomcat, I
have added a listener as follows:

<Listener className="org.apache.ajp.tomcat4.config.ApacheConfig"
modJk="/usr/apache/modules/mod_jk.so" />

which points to the location of mod_jk.so.

I have added the same line under the Host section, with the added
attributes:

append="true" forwardAll="false"

My main question is, how do I get my static content from HTTPD to link
to my web application under Tomcat. Do I simply add the Tomcat port
number (8080) to the links in my static content, or is there a more
eloquent way of doing things? I thought the point of the connector was
to prevent having to do this so the experience is seamless for the
user.

Any help or ideas are greatly appreciated.

Thanks,

Brad Mann
Software Engineer - Information Access Services
HARRIS Corporation / GCSD
(321) 984-6292
------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.8.2/357 - Release Date:
6/6/2006
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to