-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 André,
On 11/22/16 5:51 AM, André Warnier (tomcat) wrote: > So now, considering that such a thing would seem to have overall > an overwhelming positive effect and no negative effect that we can > think of, how would one go about proposing it ? For one, which > would be the proper instance(s) to approach and how ? > > I mean, having it adopted by acclamation would be very nice, but I > am sure that there are some additional formalities to respect > here. Lobby individual products, I suspect. httpd evidently already respects a charset in the application/x-www-form-urlencoded content-type. I'd have to check, but Tomcat might actually do that as well. Now you just have to convince e.g. Firefox and Chrome to start doing it. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJYNNAsAAoJEBzwKT+lPKRYoZcQAJpOiVO6E36yjV8owQM9KgRq wfKK8LLcxmZ/cb/6GURHnQGNOSO5MTxS3krx7hQuVb0I2P/+JDXTyaEf19Xolin3 oXKPNvdCjxi3zKh7OTWlSM6/KFVLVqyMeX6as0WPvU/bRrzkcSLx+zM5giAXjvFL JqVR966ORSOzRl2facoKyWgbSRc48qWnptuiTbq+/yadywFQ16XOM/reyKf2ach1 JY0jiSV82w6UsYKGCoX3YVuG/vAt0GL1pjxgYKZ0v0Yve1XhB1mXSfrXxC2ai0cu yFGiKtbBHGJakPBEBW6b9c6ZFOD/qtdsJ29h0TRfVm4f/z1KUbW8G7N6KPoscjku hS7TGK0dYMdhCiKRndai+LB32IHUqMkd0M/jysDt3UwHuo87YL3FHFewYDLOJ0oU jHtvVtE2OBB0PvKgTnqEvmpsXyNsiRtY6nlcscG1S0KjmWyHhqTFdiuRuTUeXTYb w/Wijwgb38TRKOQyFrxa7FQpjCt6jIQW+WDu/vOQlG/FXMfiAKvL+1BP7Oy92Po5 Gxufx60+kLqd+0dMNrS4qX6HFAiBa2FIuPAVN5yPj7DFN4wZCRa3W8MFReruupnE BddJygscxSjefh/K7LObq9zhrW9IGMBjU4xXSVWXNDO4HRhmPpffoLGqJ6jMPuqh /yvnFpd7vWuWUl7UKZPp =mfga -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
