Mark cjb> RAMBLE: The thing is, it worked in TC 6.0 cjb> but not 8.5. Is it possible a major change cjb> [...] Did TC 6.0 not cache files?
mt> The resources implementation was completely mt> re-written for 8.x [...] I'm fairly sure mt> not found results weren't cached in 6.0.x. OK, thanks for explaining the history behind that. cjb> GENERAL: Does the fact that a file does *not* cjb> exist need to be cached? If a cache ping cjb> fails, checking the file system immediately cjb> would make new files available immediately cjb> too, instead of after the cache expires. cjb> (Conversely, how does it handle a file deleted cjb> from the file system still existing in the cache?) mt> Caching not found can improve performance. mt> If a file is deleted, that deletion won't be mt> detected until the associated cache entry mt> expires. Ha, I suspected that. Good to know, thanks. :-) -- Cris Berneburg CACI Lead Software Engineer --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
