Thanks Mark for your response.

In which version tomcat has introduced these restrictions and is there any
available documentation around such cases which could help me in
understanding the nature of restrictions.

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 10:31 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:

> On 05/12/2019 16:58, Kushagra Bindal wrote:
> > Hi Mark
> >
> > Yes that's correct that we are getting this error after startup. Actually
> > in one of my url I am having extra : and thus resulting in failure. Same
> > url was working properly in 8.5.24 version. Actually I can understand
> that
> > this is not a good practice to have extra : but making such changes could
> > result into regression in application.
> >
> > So is there a way by which I can apply some setting like escape character
> > or something which could help me in resolving this issue?
>
> Sorry, no. Requests with invalid host names are always rejected.
>
> Mark
>
>
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2019, 4:23 PM Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 04/12/2019 05:19, Kushagra Bindal wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I tried to upgrade my tomcat on OpenAM from 8.5.24 to 9.0.29 version
> and
> >> I
> >>> got below error in catalina.out during startup itself.
> >>
> >> That stack trace shows that this error is in response to an incoming
> >> request, not part of the start-up sequence.
> >>
> >>> [http-nio-8080-exec-7] org.apache.coyote.AbstractProcessor.parseHost
> The
> >>> host [:] is not valid
> >>
> >> You have a broken client that is presenting an invalid Host header. If
> >> you want the error to go away, fix the broken client.
> >>
> >> Mark
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to