-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 3/27/20 13:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/03/2020 15:52, Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> On 3/26/20 18:44, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
>
> <snip/>
>
>>> I think that those are available via the standard
>>> request.getParameter(name) API.
>>
>> That doesn't work. Mixing request.getParameter() and
>> request.getParts results in request.getParameter* returning
>> nulls.
>
> Then something isn't quite right as that should work. And there are
> unit tests that cover at least some combinations:
>
> TestRequest.testBug54984
Now that everything is working, I'll see what I can do to reproduce
what I was seeing earlier.
Eyeballing that test makes me think that maybe the problem is that if
you call request.getParts() first, you can't then go back and call
getParameter("foo").
- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - https://www.enigmail.net/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=ShRj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
