The specification language isn't is tight as I'd like it to be but I think 
you're right - the intention of the spec authors was that NO_ERROR gets used 
here. I'll get that updated for the next round of releases.
Cool! Thanks a lot, Mark!

--
Lorenzo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to