Hi Rémy,

Thanks for sharing the information but by when it is available on tomcat Home 
page https://tomcat.apache.org/? or is it safe to update this tomcat(9.0.82) to 
production version ?

Thanks and Regards,
Rajendra Rathore
9922701491

-----Original Message-----
From: Rémy Maucherat <r...@apache.org>
Sent: Friday, October 13, 2023 1:04 PM
To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 9.0.81 Degraded ssl performance

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 9:25 AM Rathore, Rajendra <rarath...@ptc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Team,
>
> Can you please share the release plan for 9.0.82 version, as we are planning 
> to update it?

You can get it at the usual place: https://tomcat.apache.org/download-90.cgi

Rémy

>
> Thanks and Regards,
> Rajendra Rathore
> 9922701491
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: i...@flyingfischer.ch <i...@flyingfischer.ch>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 10:54 AM
> To: users@tomcat.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Tomcat 9.0.81 Degraded ssl performance
>
> Am 12.10.23 um 03:01 schrieb Paul Zepernick:
> > Thank you Chuck
> >
> > Paul
> > ________________________________
> > From: Chuck Caldarale <n82...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 11, 2023 8:54:59 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org>
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat 9.0.81 Degraded ssl performance
> >
> > NOTICE: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not 
> > click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know 
> > the content is safe.
> >
> >> On Oct 11, 2023, at 19:44, Paul Zepernick <paul.zepern...@healthsmart.com> 
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Tomcat Version: 9.0.81
> >> OS: Windows Server 2016
> >>
> >> We recently patched one of our QA servers to test 9.0.81 and ran into 
> >> performance issues.  Page loads that normally take 1-2 seconds are now 
> >> taking 50-60 seconds.  We were finally able to narrow the issue down to 
> >> the SSL connector.  Adding an HTTP connector and bypassing ssl resolves 
> >> the performance issue.  We have also tested rolling back to 9.0.80 with 
> >> the same configuration and verified the issue does not exist.
> >>
> > This was due to a regression introduced in 9.0.81, as noted here:
> > https://bz/
> > .a%2F&data=05%7C01%7Crarathore%40ptc.com%7C3432f780a6f346997a3e08dbc
> > bbedd70%7Cb9921086ff774d0d828acb3381f678e2%7C0%7C0%7C638327792861320
> > 216%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJB
> > TiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=024RK4UFHLTSrrfI7JO
> > qRlHbMHjvFQN7qvH5hEUIUW4%3D&reserved=0
> > pache.org%2Fbugzilla%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D67670&data=05%7C01%7Crara
> > th
> > ore%40ptc.com%7C1792927bf49742d936b208dbcae3a63e%7Cb9921086ff774d0d8
> > 28
> > acb3381f678e2%7C0%7C0%7C638326851325327468%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8e
> > yJ
> > WIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C30
> > 00
> > %7C%7C%7C&sdata=jJCF0r%2F8vUBpRjc04kWHuGrRiOygwANqpVpfBKXQYEo%3D&res
> > er
> > ved=0<https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%252
> > F%25
> > 2Fbz.apache.org%2Fbugzilla%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D67670&data=05%7C01%
> > 7C
> > rarathore%40ptc.com%7C1792927bf49742d936b208dbcae3a63e%7Cb9921086ff7
> > 74
> > d0d828acb3381f678e2%7C0%7C0%7C638326851325483103%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZ
> > sb
> > 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3
> > D%
> > 7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=IHAB3t%2B41LTsxAYh6uwFx7sa7gy%2F7Our4b%2Fj56FE
> > LA
> > s%3D&reserved=0>
> >
> > The problem has been fixed in 9.0.82 which is currently being voted on; 
> > release will likely occur in another day or two.
> >
> >    - Chuck
> >
> > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
> > proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or
> > entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not
> > the intended recipient or intended recipient's authorized agent, the
> > reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> > copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this
> > e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and 
> > delete this e-mail immediately.
>
> You may also set on the connector as a workaround
>
> compression="off"
>
> This will resolve the issue for the time being without the need to downgrade 
> to an insecure version.
>
>
> Markus
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to