Rainer Jung-3 wrote:
> 
> What do you mean by "losing sessions"? I expect you mean users work in a 
> session and then they send a request and get a response indicating, that 
> the requested session has not been found?
> 
> Thats exactly what I meant.
> 
> If so:
> 
> - does it happen in times, when you get errors in the mod_jk-log? Does 
> it happen at all times, or do you have peaks at special times?
> 
> I can't figure it out, when this happens, but there isn't any special
> moment I can observe. 
> It happens randomly. There isn't any error in mod_jk.log
> 
> - if it happens even when there's no other problem at the same time:
> 
> You can also add a request log to mod_jk, that logs, which worker has 
> beend chosen for every request. That way you do not rely on your user 
> feedback, but can measure the problem yourself (how many users/sessions, 
> what time of day etc.).
> 
> And here I need some help. In mod_jk.log I always see the same worker -
> balancer worker, so I don't know which worker has been choosen. How can I
> change it ? I assume by adding request log to mod_jk you mean something
> like this:
> 
> # JkRequestLogFormat set the request format
>   JkRequestLogFormat     "%w %V %T"
> 
> 
> 
>> Of course sticky_session is set to "true".
>> Below I paste our config files. Please help if you only can.
>> 
>> Best regards
>> Artur
>> 
>> ###Jk status for one day:
>> 
>> Name Type    jvmRoute        Host    Addr    Stat    D       F       M       
>> V       Acc     Err     Wr      Rd      Busy    Max     RR      Cd
>> worker2      ajp13   worker2 localhost:8009  127.0.0.1:8009  OK      0       
>> 1       1       2144    824825
>> 512
>> 480M 5.8G    6       138     worker3
> 
> worker3 is in the original output and has iĆ³nly been removed by your 
> copy&paste?
> 
> Right
> 
> What was happening, when you got these 2144 Errors? The time stamps 
> should be available from the mod_jk log.
> 
> "Loosing session" occurs even when there arnen't any errors in mod_jk
> status manager, it just looks like with next request you have to "log in"
> once more.
> 
> 
>> ###httpd.mpm section:
>> # worker MPM
>> # StartServers: initial number of server processes to start
>> # MaxClients: maximum number of simultaneous client connections
>> # MinSpareThreads: minimum number of worker threads which are kept spare
>> # MaxSpareThreads: maximum number of worker threads which are kept spare
>> # ThreadsPerChild: constant number of worker threads in each server
>> process
>> # MaxRequestsPerChild: maximum number of requests a server process serves
>> 
>> <IfModule mpm_worker_module>
>>     StartServers         5
>>     MaxClients           448
>>     MinSpareThreads      5
>>     MaxSpareThreads      25 
>>     ThreadsPerChild      7
>>     MaxRequestsPerChild   0
>> </IfModule>
> 
> Interesting, very few ThreadsPerChild. Not really a problem, but I 
> wonder if this is efficient.
> 
> We have decresed this value because we thought that maybe Apache is
> opening too many threads to Tomcat. We had in Tomcat's log entries saying"
> "All threads (500) are curently busy, increase maxThreds". 
> 
> Think about using connect_timeout and prepost_timeout. Maybe also set 
> recovery_options to 3.
> 
> What values do you suggest for above parameters ?
> 
> 
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Mod_jk-balancing%2C-session-problem-tf2073073.html#a5710742
Sent from the Tomcat - User forum at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to