Leon Rosenberg wrote:
I thought Filip coded something similar, a pooling NIO connector in java.
Leon
thats correct, it will be included in 6.0, in terms of performance it
ranks like this
HTTP Nr Of Connections < maxThreads
1. Blocking IO Connector
2. Java NIO connector and APR connector are fairly similar
HTTP Nr Of Connections > maxThreads
1. Java NIO connector and APR connector are fairly similar
2. Blocking IO Connector
HTTPS
1. The APR connector due to built in with native OpenSSL
2. NIO connector
3. Blocking IO connector
Filip
On 8/30/06, Caldarale, Charles R <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Leon Rosenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Tool for monitoring Tomcat from the client side
>
> This slightly besser performance, is it achieved by C or by
> using epoll?
Good question, and I don't know the answer. It would be interesting to
see if there's any performance difference by recoding the pure Java
request handler in Tomcat to use NIO and its polling capability. Any
volunteers?
- Chuck
THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY
MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you
received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail
and its attachments from all computers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
