I'll have a look into it. Henk Fictorie schrieb: > Hi, > > Since recently the name of the worker isn't necessary the same as the > jvmRoute of the connected Tomcat instance. You can specify: > > worker.foo.jvm_route=bar > > In the mod_jk logging these two names are used both, which causes some > confusion. The requestlogging will used the jvm_route, while the error > messages will use the name of the worker. E.g. > > JkRequestLogFormat "%R %r %s %T" > [Mon Nov 13 00:01:46 2006] bar GET /tomcat/page HTTP/1.1 200 0.511555 > > and > > [Mon Nov 13 00:11:57 2006] [11751:0012] [info] service::jk_lb_worker.c > (906): service failed, worker foo is in error > state > > Could in the upcoming mod_jk 1.2.20 release this be changed to using the > name of the worker also in the Request Logging. > > regards Henk Fictorie > >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
