Have a look at:

http://yourserver:yourport/manager/jmxproxy?qry=*:*

to find out about the available monitoring info. Once you find the beans
you are interested in, you can make the query *:* more precise.

Tim Lucia schrieb:
> Let me now ask my own question about this -- Lambda Probe is a great tool
> for inspecting your app's current state (and Tomcat's overall state.)  Is it
> possible to get, using /probe or any other app (including tomcat's own
> manager) the current state of the connection pools in a machine-readable
> form (XML, one per line, CSV, etc.)?  One that could easily be parsed with
> perl for consumption by MRTG?  Lambda Probe's generated HTML isn't too
> easily parsed, at least for my novice perl skills.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Lucia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 4:29 PM
> To: 'Tomcat Users List'
> Subject: RE: session replication/tomcat 5.5
> 
> I forgot to mention that we peak at about 6000 sessions on the average day.
> The all-time max for 2006 is 6810 sessions.
> 
> For monitoring, we do several things.
> 
> 1) We use lambda probe
> 2) We use MRTG and some scripts to graph things that the manager will
> readily disclose, like requests, threads, sessions, etc.
> 3) We use MRTG and some built-in application statistics for
> application-specific statistics
> 
> At some point, I will probably use lamdaprobe to populate MRTG graphs of the
> connection pools.  Right now we don't really monitor them per se
> 
> When you say "sessions per instance" keep in mind that sessions are shared
> across the cluster (or domain if so partitioned), otherwise it wouldn't be
> fault-tolerant.
> 
> There is no pro-active alert if something is bad, other then the customers
> call the support line ;-)  But we do have a large monitor in the engineering
> department visible to most of us with the vital MRTG graphs on display.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David O'Dell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006 3:03 PM
> To: Tomcat Users List
> Subject: Re: session replication/tomcat 5.5
> 
> Good to hear that someone is using this.
> I want to try this out in my environment with 8 instances of tomcat each 
> with around 2,500 sessions per instance.
> Does this sound feasible?
> Also how do you monitor the cluster status?
> 
> 
> Tim Lucia wrote:
>> As a case study, I have, in production, 4 Dell 2850 servers (running Red
> Hat
>> Enterprise V4.)  Apache httpd on one, using JK for load balancing.  The
>> other three are running Tomcat in a 3-way multicast cluster, multicasting
>> with replication on a private VLAN (192.168.x)  The application accesses
>> several DB servers running Oracle and MySQL, depending on the DB
> requested.
>> Over time, this handles 2 requests per second average, with peaks at about
>> 5-6 requests per second (Per Tomcat, so times 3).  This does not begin to
>> tax the Tomcat servers for memory or CPU.  The bulk of the time is
> database
>> latency.  Our usage profile is extremely regular and predictable -- we
>> service school districts and they mainly use it from 8 to 3 (local time.)
>>
>> This configuration has been very reliable and far-surpasses the system it
>> replaced - based on IIS and JRun.
>>
>> HTH,
>> Tim
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: David O'Dell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
>> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:27 PM
>> To: Tomcat Users List
>> Subject: session replication/tomcat 5.5
>>
>> Is anyone using session replication in production?
>>
>> Is there an alternative to using multicasting?
>>
>> In the doc http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/cluster-howto.html
>>
>> It states "This is an algorithm that is only efficient when the clusters 
>> are small."
>> I have 6 tomcat instances behind a load balancer, is this still 
>> considered small?
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>   
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to