Hi Martin, these lines only mean, that mod_jk is checking whether it should forward the request or not, but it doesn't find a match (=JkMount), so it decides to let other apache modules handle the request. This part of request processing is normal, even if there is no JkMount.
Regards, Rainer Martin Hochreiter schrieb: > Rainer Jung schrieb: >> Hi, >> >> Martin Hochreiter schrieb: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> I have some problems with Tomcat & JK Connector and Apache Virtual >>> hosts. >>> >>> Apache should only give requests of one virtual host to the jk >>> connector, but >>> it handles all requests over to the jk connector, no matter what host. >>> >> >> I didn't try your config, but it looks like the config is OK. The first >> virtual server should not forward any requests, the second one should >> forward all requests. >> >> >>> Actually the log files of jkerror.log are very big - and getting bigger. >>> >> >> You've not JkLogLevel statement. The docs say it's default is INFO, but >> some versions of mod_jk are broken with respect to the default log level >> and take debug or trace instead. Please add an explicit "JkLogLevel >> info" to the config. >> >> >>> As jk could not map the uri of other virtual hosts, it gives the request >>> back to apache (or something) and the right page opens, but I don't >>> want apache to handle all requests of all virtual hosts to the >>> connector. >>> >> >> Are you sure that mod_jk actually tries to forward the requests for the >> first virtual host? Maybe you are only mislead by the debug logging int >> the log file. Of course mod_jk will look at the requests (and log some >> debug lines) even, if it later decides not to forward a request via a >> worker. >> >> >>> Can somebody please give me hint? >>> >> >> Lower your log level and try to make more explicit, why you think, that >> mod_jk forwards all requests for both virtual servers. >> >> Regards, >> >> Rainer >> > Hello Rainer! > > I will lower the log level and monitor the issue - > I think that the connector gets every request because of > these lines in jkerror.log: > > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (486)]: Into > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to > map URI '/error/include/top.html' > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (486)]: Into > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to > map URI '/error/include/bottom.html' > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (486)]: Into > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (500)]: Attempting to > map URI '/error/contact.html.var' > [Wed Nov 15 07:15:09 2006] [jk_uri_worker_map.c (618)]: > jk_uri_worker_map_t::map_uri_to_worker, done without a match > > This are requests to the first virtual host and I don't understand why > apache handles > that requests over to the connector. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
