Diego--

This comes straight from the doc
Each <Context> definition must have a unique context path, which is defined by 
the path attribute. The possible attributes for the <Context> element are 
described below.
If you want to look at how one servlet can service multiple entities such as 
modules take a look at module archives (mar) deployment from 
Axis 2.0
http://ws.apache.org/axis2/0_95/userguide4.html

hth,
M--
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
This e-mail message (including attachments, if any) is intended for the use of 
the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information 
that is privileged, proprietary , confidential and exempt from disclosure. If 
you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any dissemination, 
distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Le présent message électronique (y compris les pièces qui y sont annexées, le 
cas échéant) s'adresse au destinataire indiqué et peut contenir des 
renseignements de caractère privé ou confidentiel. Si vous n'êtes pas le 
destinataire de ce document, nous vous signalons qu'il est strictement interdit 
de le diffuser, de le distribuer ou de le reproduire.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Diego Rodriguez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <users@tomcat.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 2:29 PM
Subject: Max number of contexts


> 
> Hi,
> 
>    I'm using Tomcat 5.5.20. In the docs says "You may define as many 
> *Context* elements as you wish"
> 
>    I'm going to design a new web application that will act as a kernel 
> for other lightweight webapps that will implement different services and 
> may be hot installed at any time. My plan is implement these services 
> (lightweight webapps) as contexts that will register in the kernel using 
> a ContextListener. What I would like to know is if there is any real 
> maximum or a performance penalty if I reach some limit. Is there anybody 
> who has implemented an architecture like this?
> 
>    Thanks in advance
> 
>       Diego
>

Reply via email to