On 04/07/07, Anton Melser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 04/07/07, Bill Barker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> "Anton Melser" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > (maybe a repost?)
> > Hi all,
> > We are running tomcat 5.5.23 on java 1.6.0 (suse 10.0 with addon java6
> > rpms for suse 10.1). These machines are load balanced behind an apache
> > 2.2.2 with mod_jk jakarta-tomcat-connectors-1.2.15 (both compiled from
> > sources). We have a page that is showing the html source instead of
> > the page on firefox2. The funny thing is that when the page is
> > accessed directly then the content type is text/html (and the page
> > shows correctly) but when coming through mod_jk, it is coming as
> > text/plain (and showing the source). This doesn't seem to bother
> > IE7...
> > Does anyone have any ideas?
>
> Well, the default content-type for httpd is text/plain, so if you have a
> controller servlet something like:
>
>    protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest req, HttpServletResponse res)
>      throws ServletException, IOException {
>         req.setAttribute("myBean", myBean);
>         RequestDispatcher rd =
> getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher("/WEB-INF/jsps/display.jsp");
>         rd.include(req, res);
>     }
>
> Then the JSP page will not be able to add it's content-type header, so httpd
> will add it's default content-type header when the response is sent back.

We have this in our spring controller...

...
response.setContentType("text/html; charset=UTF-8");
response.setCharacterEncoding("UTF-8");
Writer writer= response.getWriter();
if(bText) {
        writer.append("<html><head><meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\"
content=\"text/html; charset=UTF-8\">\n</head>\n<body>\n");
}

writer.append(pageBody);

if(bText) {
        writer.append("\n</body></html>");
}
...

And the funny thing is that it seems to work... but only for straight
tomcat. I will make a confession - I do mainly .net these days and my
java (particularly web) is lacking in any real depth of understanding.
So I am guessing from your comments that the default content type of
tomcat is text/html? That is what we get with straight tomcat...
In any case, if this code is wrong then can someone give me a
suggestion to make it right?
Thanks again.
Anton

Sorry, on closer inspection it was working because tomcat doesn't seem
to send any contenttype at all... changing the default apache
contenttype to text/html seems to work without any nefarious
consequences.
Thanks,
Anton

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to