Right now we using TomCat 4.1 with JDK 1.1. Would our TomCat version work if we update to J2SDK 5.0 with Update 6?
Please help!!! Many thanks -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Hook [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 4:55 PM To: users@tomcat.apache.org Subject: Re: Tomcat5.0.28 character encodingg problem I think my statement of "most browsers will ignore this value" might have been a tad bit on the excessive side upon further reading and i was hoping to have that read as don't only rely on using the meta tag. >From my understanding there are broswers where they can set their own content type no matter what comes down in the response. Even if the content type is set in the header or with a meta tag. I'm not saying this is a good thing. I'm just saying that I read this somewhere in passing when we were trying to figure out how to character encoding. Some browsers just won't do what you're ask them to. However, setting the content type in both the header and in the meta tag isn't a bad thing. It can only really help you. Its much like when you're asking the client and all the intermediary servers not to cache any of your pages. Setting a few of the cache-control values should work, but its best to send all the values you can to make sure that you're communicating to everyone you can. httpResponse.addHeader("Cache-Control", "no-chache, no-store, must-revalidate, max-age=0, proxy-revalidate, no-transform, pre-check=0, post-check=0, private"); Even in the case above. If a intermediary server wants to cache your data... its going to cache your data. I guess what I'm really trying to say is if there are many ways of telling a browser how to handle something, implement everyone of those ways. Because you aren't guaranteed that any specific was is going to work on all browsers. Warm Regards. ----Original Message Follows---- From: Christopher Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Tomcat Users List <users@tomcat.apache.org> Nathan, Nathan Hook wrote: > - Set the meta type in each and every jsp to be utf-8. Now, most > browsers will ignore this value from my understanding, but it shouldn't > hurt to add it. Really? The HTTP header should override any META tag, but the META tag should be used if, for some reason, there is no Content-Type header. - -chris _________________________________________________________________ http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=hmtextlinkjuly07 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
