I remind myself regularly that the address is a link at the bottom of
every eamil I get from the list,
and using that sets up everything I need.
Since I save (some) list items, it's easy to get the address to start a
new thread.
--Ken Bowen
Tony Fountain wrote:
Yes, I did do that - it was just a simple way to obtain the email
address. I'll be careful not to do this again as I was unaware of this.
Thanks,
Tony Fountain
Benefit Concepts, Inc.
(419) 244-9936 x9010 (office)
(419) 249-7221 (fax)
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark H. Wood,UL 0115A,+1 317 274 0749,
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark H. Wood
Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 8:51 AM
To: users@tomcat.apache.org
Subject: Re: New to Apache
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 06:58:23PM -0400, Mark Thomas wrote:
Tony Fountain wrote:
Mark,
I did not hijack a thread. I started this one myself.
No you didn't. You hit reply to an old message deleted the content and
changed the subject. Please don't do this.
Possibly he's an innocent victim of today's over-helpful MUAs. If I'd
never seen or been told about the Message-ID:, In-Reply-To:, and
References: headers, I'd think that the above actions had wiped out all
traces of the previous thread, and I would think I'm being efficient by
letting the MUA copy the list address for me instead of typing it
myself.
Authors of gooey MUAs would do well to support listmail better by, for
example, providing a button to "send new message to the list that
reflected this message", or enabling the association of a folder with an
address and providing a button for "send to this folder's associated
address".
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
