Did anyone do the comparison between ajp13 and http for the protocol ? I'd like to understand what the test cases were that were used for the test. ie if the application takes a second to make the resulting html if it takes 2 seconds to make the html how does that affect the performance ?
D On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 17:02 +0100, Rainer Jung wrote: > Caldarale, Charles R schrieb: > >> Does the new io really slower then the regular protocol? > > > > Yes; read this: > > http://marc.info/?l=tomcat-user&m=119635696312254&w=2 > > > > - Chuck > > and: speed != performance > > As an approximation: > > Throughput * AvgResponseTime = Parallelity > > Naively speed is the same as average response time. In most cases its > better to think of performance as high throughput with acceptable > response time. > > The formula shows you, that a solution, that is able to handle a very > high parallelity could have a better performance (=throughput), than > another one, even if the average response time might be worse. > > The NIO connector should be good in allowing a higher parallelism and > thus achieve good throughput, even if the response times are worse than > with the traditional connector. > > How important this is depends on the application scenario. > > Its never enough to only think about speed or only think about > throughput when talking about high load. You need to define your minimal > requirements for both of them and then search for the corresponding > solution. > > Regards, > > Rainer > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]