> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: SEVERE: Error listenerStart > > Come on, I have no inclination to become a J2EE hacker.
No one's asking you to be a J2EE "hacker", but some familiarity with the problem domain is expected. GIYF. > Yet, I still maintain that the term "listener" is very > misleading. The term "listener" in a data processing context predates J2EE, perl, and even sockets by decades. For example, it was used at least as far back as the 1950s to describe the action taken to wait for events or input on an I/O channel. Computer science co-opted the term in the early 1960s to refer to any mechanism waiting for some event. > Btw, would a -Djava.library.path provided argument take > precedence over LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings Yes, the system property overrides the environment variable (Java launchers on Windows use PATH, not LD_LIBRARY_PATH, by the way, if you ever use that platform). > But interestingly, they both are 32bit builds while my kernel is > a 64Bit one. That is likely the root of the problem. Sounds like you need to contact your .war vendor and have them supply 64-bit .so files; alternatively, you could install and run a 32-bit JVM, but that would seem to be a serious step backwards. - Chuck THIS COMMUNICATION MAY CONTAIN CONFIDENTIAL AND/OR OTHERWISE PROPRIETARY MATERIAL and is thus for use only by the intended recipient. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the e-mail and its attachments from all computers. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
