-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Da,
Lists wrote: |> My guess (and that's all it is) is that you have eliminated much of the |> context-switching overhead that two instances would have compared to one. | | Ah I see. I guess i can look at that with mpstat and look at things like | thread migrations etc. Important because if we install more CPU's i guess | that may mitigate the context switching overhead. Or maybe we can gain | performance by tying zones to one or two cpu's. Is there any advantage to running multiple JVMs on a single machine? Why not just give your single JVM a big chunk of memory and let it do its thing? | Opteron 254 vs 252. So 0.2ghz less but afaik no other difference. Not | enough of a difference to account for the additional cpu. so this box uses | 80% cpu vs 30% on the other one for the same load. Do you mean "same webapp load"? Obviously, that addition load is coming from /somewhere/. What about other services running on the same machine? - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkgdrqkACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PCgqACfRxKediPbJyxkYpcBA0z1Qslt 5M8An1t6VYvyOh3+tMThcXqIZcHQFGVc =y2AR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To start a new topic, e-mail: users@tomcat.apache.org To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
