Caldarale, Charles R schrieb am 01.02.2009 um 22:38:57 (-0600): > > From: Michael Ludwig [mailto:mil...@gmx.de] > > Subject: Re: UnsatisfiedLinkError in Windows Service (tomcat6w/5w.exe) > > > > The Java bridge DLLs (or whatever they're called) can be moved to a > > directory only contained in java.library.path, but not in PATH. The > > other libraries must be in a PATH directory in order to be loaded. > > If I'm interpreting your posting correctly, it looks like you have > discovered that the other DLLs are not being loaded by the JVM, but > rather indirectly, due to references from the ones the JVM loads.
Sort of. I knew before that the Java bridge libraries would load the other ones, but I didn't know it would matter. I thought that under the hood, java.library.path would be equivalent to setting PATH, so I didn't understand that one would fail where the other wouldn't. > If you really wanted to keep them all under java.library.path, you > could write some initialization code for your webapp that does > loadLibrary() calls on the previously indirectly loaded ones; I see, System.loadLibrary(). Never used that before. > but it's probably simpler just to keep them visible in PATH. I think so, too. Thanks for your help and advice in dealing with this. Michael Ludwig --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
