Ken Bowen wrote:

All,

Being bored and trying to avoid starting any real work on a slushy snowy morning, I organized the discussion for inclusion on Andre's list (below). BTW, GIF/WIF: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics :: "Lies, damned lies, and statistics" is part of a phrase attributed to Benjamin Disraeli and popularised in the United States by Mark Twain

Cheers...Ken

    From:     rbs...@gmx.com
    Subject:     Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 2:53:26 AM EDT
    To:     users@tomcat.apache.org
    Reply-To:     users@tomcat.apache.org

Hi,
Can any tell the maximum number of users can login into tomcat at the same
time?
Can I use tomcat to run in an online internet application used by n number
of users and the application runs for 24*7?
Is it reliable?
Thanks
RBS
--------------
    From:     rc4...@googlemail.com
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 5:24:08 AM EDT

All depends on your configuration, directly porpotional to "n".

And no, Tomcat is not reliable at all, it's more kinda toy for bored
developers such as me.

That's why we are using Tomcat in a 24/7-environment with a couple of
1000 users, never had any unscheduled dropouts.

Rgds

Gregor

PS.:http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/Performance_and_Monitoring
--------------
    From:     rainer.j...@kippdata.de
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 6:37:57 AM EDT

On 09.03.2009 10:24, Gregor Schneider wrote:
And no, Tomcat is not reliable at all, it's more kinda toy for bored
developers such as me.

:)
--------------
    From:     a...@ice-sa.com
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 8:40:23 AM EDT

Rainer Jung wrote:
On 09.03.2009 10:24, Gregor Schneider wrote:
And no, Tomcat is not reliable at all, it's more kinda toy for bored
developers such as me.
:)
A statistical answer :
- searching Google for "tomcat problems" gives approximately 2,730,000 links.
 - searching Google for "Tomcat works" gives 5,070,000 links.
 - 2,730,000 + 5,070,000 = 7,800,000 links
 - 5,070,000 / 7,800,000 = 0.65
65% reliability is not bad for a free product.
--------------
    From:     rosenberg.l...@googlemail.com
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 8:52:54 AM EDT

what a glorious example of self cozenage.
Why do you assume that "tomcat works" is not included in the "tomcat
problems" result?
+tomcat +problems -works -> 1,830,000 results.
+tomcat -problems +works -> 227,000

227/(227+1830) -> 11% Reliability ... :-)

of course this statement is as un-serious as yours :-)
--------------
    From:     a...@ice-sa.com
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 9:20:39 AM EDT

I must admit that my first statistical analysis was flawed, and furthermore lacked an element of comparison. So I refined it and created this table, applying the same objective meta-analysis criteria to a range of products :

Product            problems   works     total      reliability %

Apache (httpd)     647,000    857,000   1,504,000    81
IIS              6,530,000  5,900,000  12,430,000    47
Tomcat           2,730,000  5,070,000   7,800,000    65
Jboss              967,000  1,050,000   2,017,000    52
Glassfish          125,000    155,000     280,000    55
Windows         37,500,000 44,300,000  81,800,000    54

 From this, we can draw a number of conclusions :
a) there are a lot more Windows users than anything else
b) there are about 5 times more Tomcat users than Apache httpd users
c) Apache httpd is at least 15% more reliable than any servlet server
d) Tomcat is the most reliable servlet server
e) Most IIS users have problems
f) on a price/reliability ratio, Apache httpd and Tomcat win hands down
--------------
    From:     rc4...@googlemail.com
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 9:36:00 AM EDT

Well, maybe this list helps to answer the question about Tomcat's reliablity:
http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/PoweredBy

Besides, I guess a lot of companies (like us) don't advertise using
Tomcat due to security-concerns.

I'm just wondering if the OP could digest any information from those
answers now ;)

Rgds

Gregor
--------------
    From:     chuck.caldar...@unisys.com
    Subject:     RE: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 9:40:33 AM EDT

From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
Subject: Re: Max Number of users

 From this, we can draw a number of conclusions :

"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli (maybe)

- Chuck
--------------
    From:     a...@ice-sa.com
    Subject:     Re: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 9:50:14 AM EDT

Caldarale, Charles R wrote:
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com] Subject: Re: Max Number of users

 From this, we can draw a number of conclusions :
"There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics." - Benjamin Disraeli (maybe) A statistician is a person who can affirm that another person having one foot caught in ice and the other foot in a bucket of boiling water, is on average in a comfortable position.
--------------
    From:     peter.crowt...@melandra.com
    Subject:     [OT] RE: Max Number of users
    Date:     March 9, 2009 10:02:56 AM EDT
From: André Warnier [mailto:a...@ice-sa.com]
A statistician is a person who can affirm that another person
having one
foot caught in ice and the other foot in a bucket of boiling water, is
on average in a comfortable position.

... but only if they're feeling mean.

               - Peter
--------------

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lies,_damned_lies,_and_statistics ::
"Lies, damned lies, and statistics" is part of a phrase attributed to Benjamin Disraeli and popularised in the United States by Mark Twain

Thanks to Ken for bringing a bit of order into this statistical chaos.

With the idea of refining the very rough analysis and table above, I tried to check if there would be any cultural bias in the results as provided by www.google.com, by crosschecking them by language. I thus called up www.google.es (spanish), and searched for respectively "Tomcat problemas" (2,850,000 hits) and "Tomcat funciona" (only 88,000 hits), for a total thus of 2,938,000 hits, which by the same calculation would give us a Spanish reliability ratio for Tomcat of only a dismal 2.9 %. The reality is in fact even worse, because the search on "Tomcat funciona" generates a substantial number of hits on "Tomcat no funciona", so the 88,000 hits do not even represent the real total of satisfied users. We would thus have to assume either that Spanish-speaking users, culturally, are less grateful and much more likely to post messages when things do not work than when they do work, or else have to admit that Tomcat is somehow incompatible with the Spanish language. Would any of the committers know if there is substance to either one of the previous suspicions, or dispose of a statistical technique allowing to overcome this possibly cultural bias ? As a control, I performed the same analysis on IIS, with the following results :

IIS problemas : 6,730,000
IIS funciona : 165,000
total : 6,895,000
reliability ratio : 2.3 %

which would tend to indicate that the bias, if any, also applies to other software products, even non-free. To remove any high-technology related effect, I also tried to apply the same analysis to themes unrelated to Tomcat, such as "coche" (car) (4,850,000/2,200,000), "mujer" (woman) (15,900,000/10,200,000), and "hombre" (man) (17,200,000/11,300,000) and so far it seems to lead to the conclusion that Spanish-speaking people, independently of sex, are rather grouchy, although less so on these other kinds of products than on web software.



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to