-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Chuck,
On 5/25/2009 1:30 PM, Caldarale, Charles R wrote: >> From: Caldarale, Charles R >> Subject: RE: Apache httpd vs Tomcat static content performance [more >> results] > > There are some extracts from the 2007 O'Reilly Tomcat book about > benchmarking on somewhat newer hardware than Chris is using: > http://www.devshed.com/c/b/BrainDump/ > > The interesting articles are dated 02-12-09 through 03-05-09 (silly > American date format), with actual results in the second page of the > 02-26-09 article: > http://www.devshed.com/c/a/BrainDump/Tomcat-Benchmark-Procedure/1/ Interestingly enough, their results suggest that the "Tomcat HTTP JIO" connector (presumably the basic Coyote connector without APR) performs the best. The workload (50k requests) relative to the type of machine used (64-bit, presumably fast CPUs) seems like too little work to get a good sample. Note that they use requests-per-second as their metric and not transfer rate, but those numbers are so closely related as to be synonymous for comparison purposes. I will have to start testing prefork httpd (my current configuration) against worker httpd to see how they compare. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkodYCEACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDWpQCfWunji/z1ZbxxX5fAklWm1rsh /6gAn3P42e4TFPtIIgVyUz1uP8vGTOmZ =yMwV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
