-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

David,

On 11/17/2009 11:59 AM, David Smith wrote:
> Christopher Schultz wrote:
>> David,
>>
>> On 11/17/2009 7:39 AM, David Smith wrote:
>>> Your tomcat has to listen on 443 to remove the port number from the
>>> URL.  This is not a tomcat issue, but rather the browser's expectation.
>>
>> That's not entirely true. If Robert configures his firewall to redirect
>> port 443 -> 8443 similar to how he does 80 -> 8080, then he can "remove"
>> the port number from the URL by changing the redirectPort attribute in
>> his <Connector> to "443".
>>
> You're talking about proxying the connection with a reverse proxy.

No, I'm talking about port forwarding, which is apparently what he's
already doing with 80 -> 8080.

> That
> works, but I believe the connector will have to have proxyPort set so
> generated URLs within the app don't include a port number.

That may be necessary given that the <Connector> thinks that the port
number is 8080 (or 8443) instead of 80 (or 8080). Thanks for pointing
that out.

- -chris
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAksDBC4ACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDlyACgkmy2WPIzm0coQg7RR8GtBz+v
Ix4An390CgFpNuBGrP0OoK6hY8Vv6/f/
=GWMJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org

Reply via email to