On 23/06/2011 16:30, Martin Dubuc wrote: > Can you confirm that the patches to apply to solve this issue are the > following ones: r1138550 and r1138555?
r1138550 is purely cosmetic. r1138555 is the patch that should fix this. Mark > > Martin > > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 22/06/2011 20:03, Martin Dubuc wrote: >>> Mark, >>> >>> Thanks for looking into this and working to get the patch in for future >>> versions. It will allow us to use later versions of Tomcat and not be >> stuck >>> on 7.0.10. >>> >>> If you would like me to test the patch, I can rebuild from patched source >>> and test locally. >> >> Please. It would be good to get confirmation that it is now working as >> intended. >> >> Mark >> >>> >>> Martin >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Tomcat 6.0.x looks to be OK. There is a copy/paste problem in 7.0.x that >>>> I'll fixed shortly. >>>> >>>> If you are willing to build Tomcat 7.0.x from source (not hard) then it >>>> will be easy for you to test the patch. >>>> >>>> Mark >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
