On 14/07/2011 11:29, André Warnier wrote: > Hi. > > This is a bit of a side question, or let's say a question-by-proxy. > > I happen to be also subscribed to a support list for mod_perl, and > someone there made the following comment as part of a post : > > quote > > We have 100+ web servers where apache fronts a separate tomcat server > using mod_proxy. > > Sadly, the tomcat dev's forgot to set any caching headers in the HTTP > response (either Expires, Last-Modified or Cache-control) so the sites > are largely uncacheable by browsers and the various tomcats are becoming > overloaded. > > unquote
I'd ask the OP to back that up with an explanation and some proof, contrary to the below: Request URL:http://localhost:8081/tomcat.png Request Method:GET Status Code:304 Not Modified Accept:text/html,application/xhtml+xml,application/xml;q=0.9,*/*;q=0.8 Accept-Charset:ISO-8859-1,utf-8;q=0.7,*;q=0.3 Accept-Encoding:gzip,deflate,sdch Accept-Language:en-US,en;q=0.8 Cache-Control:max-age=0 Connection:keep-alive Host:localhost:8081 If-Modified-Since:Sat, 02 Jul 2011 21:38:58 GMT If-None-Match:W/"5103-1309642738000" User-Agent:Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_6_8) AppleWebKit/535.1 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/14.0.803.0 Safari/535.1 Date:Thu, 14 Jul 2011 10:35:31 GMT ETag:W/"5103-1309642738000" Server:Apache-Coyote/1.1 p > Do any of the dev's here have a comment to make ? > > (sadly, the mod_perl OP failed to provide any version information so far).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
