-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Asha,
On 11/22/11 2:15 AM, Asha K S wrote: > Is there any performance comparison document available already > between http and AJP It should be easy to test in your own environment. If you are using AJP through another web server, the overhead of the server itself is obviously non-zero. If you're asking about connecting httpd and Tomcat via HTTP or AJP, then you'll have to do your own testing. I'm not sure there are any current performance comparisons out there. If you are using HTTPS in to Tomcat (that is, terminating SSL at httpd, then using HTTPS between httpd and Tomcat) then you definitely want to use the APR (aka "native") connector as it's crypto implementation is much faster than the Java one. - -chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.17 (Darwin) Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk7MFVsACgkQ9CaO5/Lv0PDajQCgmiaAqsG2jbBsTzRM2bdBy6w4 3XoAoLP3AaabD5F0FH8xwqJLvuqKd5zb =ErhA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
