2012/4/10 André Warnier <a...@ice-sa.com>: > Konstantin Kolinko wrote: > ... >> >> This is from Tomcat 7 access log: >> >> [[[ >> 127.0.0.1 - - [10/Apr/2012:21:08:31 +0400] "POST >> >> /manager/html/upload?org.apache.catalina.filters.CSRF_NONCE=B5B161E96A5566CCE5FA70AB6477B2B9 >> HTTP/1.1" 400 - in:[-1980123022] out:[-] >> >> 127.0.0.1 - - [10/Apr/2012:21:09:24 +0400] "POST >> >> /manager/html/upload?org.apache.catalina.filters.CSRF_NONCE=2B89705754F848DE99DED1259DC376C1 >> HTTP/1.1" 400 - in:[-198012301] out:[-] >> ]]] >> >> The first negative value is from Firefox. The second one is from IE. >> >> > There is also a factor 10 difference between them, notice ? > That cannot just be a different transfer-encoding. Or else Microsoft have > invented a really good compression method. >
;) They are negative values. So if you compare them the Firefox one is smaller. I think that one would have to test with several files to get several data points to confirm the trend. Here are Firefox bugs regarding upload:of files >2Gb: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215450 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660159 Best regards, Konstantin Kolinko --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@tomcat.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@tomcat.apache.org
