On 23/04/2012 15:06, Christopher Schultz wrote:
> Christoph,
> 
> On 4/22/12 11:55 AM, Christoph Maser wrote:
>> Chris,
> 
>> Am Donnerstag, den 19.04.2012, 18:21 +0200 schrieb Christopher
>> Schultz:
>>> Christoph,
>>>
>>> What about the webapp itself performing its own health-check as a
>>> last step of deployment, and throwing an exception (thereby
>>> preventing Tomcat from bringing it into service) if things aren't
>>> in working order?
> 
>> this is the obvious way to do it as it is now. As I said before
>> that way one looses the access to the wapps status pages.
> 
> So you want the webapp both up (for status) and down (for traffic) at
> the same time? Tomcat certainly can't manage that for you.
> 
> If you need "status" on a failed-deployment, why not dump it to a file
> or something like that?

Or use JMX rather than HTTP to acquire status information.


p



-- 

[key:62590808]

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to