Guess you spoke about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-690
Please take care to not merge any jaxrs fix done since this one (or 1.5.2 will not be a fixes release) Le 2 mars 2013 20:12, "David Blevins" <[email protected]> a écrit : > Romain, if you can post the JIRA number that'd be great. > > > -David > > On Mar 2, 2013, at 1:32 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hmm, providers were working in last release. The deployment is different > > between both release (so the conf too a bit) but it will not be merged > > because too different. > > Le 2 mars 2013 10:16, "James Green" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > >> David, > >> > >> Thanks for this. Could someone kindly establish which Jira relates to > >> JAX-RS providers not being picked up, this is in 1.6 but am not sure if > it > >> is a bug fix candidate for 1.5 or a new feature for 1.6. Given it is in > the > >> official spec I might hope for the former... > >> > >> James > >> > >> > >> Sent from my iPad > >> > >> On 2 Mar 2013, at 05:27, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >>> Based on the feedback we got we've created a 1.5.2 branch based on the > >> code from approximately Sat Jan 19. > >>> > >>> This includes the following JIRAs that were requested: > >>> > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-669 > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-668 > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-699 > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-703 > >>> > >>> This does not yet include this requested JIRA: > >>> > >>> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-779 > >>> > >>> We will definitely add that. > >>> > >>> For those that are planing to use the 1.5.2 rather than the 1.6.0 with > >> the various system rewrites for performance, can you please try the > 1.5.2 > >> snapshots and report if anything you need ismissing. > >>> > >>> Builds available here: > >>> > >>> - http://tomee.apache.org/builds.html > >>> > >>> If possible, get your feedback in by Friday and we can start rolling > >> potential release candidates. > >>> > >>> > >>> -David > >>> > >> > >
